<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which Romney Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightsfield.com/2006/12/20/which-romney-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightsfield.com/2006/12/20/which-romney-question/</link>
	<description>Holding Our Noses So You Don&#039;t Have To</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:14:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Right&#8217;s Field &#187; Blog Archive &#187; No-Mo Mitt - Time to Start a campaign death watch</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2006/12/20/which-romney-question/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>The Right&#8217;s Field &#187; Blog Archive &#187; No-Mo Mitt - Time to Start a campaign death watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 23:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2006/12/20/which-romney-question/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>[...] The broadsides against Romney have less to do with his flip-flops and more to do with Evangelical aversions to his Mormonism. Think it&#8217;s just the elites that are bringing it up? Hold your nose and peer through this search at Free Republic the only real right-wing online community. That&#8217;s the coveted Republican base. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The broadsides against Romney have less to do with his flip-flops and more to do with Evangelical aversions to his Mormonism. Think it&#8217;s just the elites that are bringing it up? Hold your nose and peer through this search at Free Republic the only real right-wing online community. That&#8217;s the coveted Republican base. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Browner Hamlin</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2006/12/20/which-romney-question/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Browner Hamlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2006/12/20/which-romney-question/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m wondering what makes Romney a first tier candidate? He&#039;s not the front-runner, a title that could arguable be given to McCain or Giuliani. Yes he was the chair of the Republican Governor&#039;s Association and he has been campaigning his ass off, but does that succeed in making him a top tier candidate worthy of this sort of scrutiny?

Something about Romney rings similar to Hillary Clinton&#039;s perception as being the front runner (though for admittedly very different reasons). He seems to be a contender because people say he&#039;s a contender and not because of any particular action or grassroots support that has caused him to merit the label.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering what makes Romney a first tier candidate? He&#8217;s not the front-runner, a title that could arguable be given to McCain or Giuliani. Yes he was the chair of the Republican Governor&#8217;s Association and he has been campaigning his ass off, but does that succeed in making him a top tier candidate worthy of this sort of scrutiny?</p>
<p>Something about Romney rings similar to Hillary Clinton&#8217;s perception as being the front runner (though for admittedly very different reasons). He seems to be a contender because people say he&#8217;s a contender and not because of any particular action or grassroots support that has caused him to merit the label.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
