I’m happy to introduce a new feature at The Right’s Field. We will be publishing regular power rankings of the Republican presidential field; our rankings will be called The Right’s Field’s Power Line (clap clap clap). TRF Power Line will only rank candidates who have announced their official candidacy or have formed presidential exploratory committees. No fantasy candidates will be included. Also, no candidates who we have ranked in the “Other Candidates” category will be included in the ranking because even if they have formally announced, they are fantasy candidates of another order all together. There will be some explanation for rankings, though this edition, since it is the first, will not be very full.

TRF Power Line is not scientific. It is not based on an aggregate of polls, though polling numbers are considered. Rather, it is a general sense of how the field is shaping up based on polls, media coverage, candidate competence, endorsements, and message resonance. The authors of this site may individually disagree with the specifics of the rankings, but they have been and will continue to be created out of a conversation we have with each other and with our commenters. That said, this is our ranking and if you have a problem with it, tell us why we’re wrong or go write your own (FYI – Oval Office 2008, Race 4 2008, and Daily Kos all have rankings of Republican candidates).

Without further ado, here is the inaugural TRF Power Line rankings of the Republican field.

1. John McCain – McCain is the Establishment Candidate and the presumptive Republican nominee. He’s got the money, organization and mainstream media adoration needed to walk away with this nomination. Of course, he’s not terribly popular with the Republican base – particularly the religious right and anti-immigrant wings. He’s going to own the escalation of the war in Iraq and he will be running as more Bush than Bush, so if Republican primary voters decide that’s not what they want in a candidate he will be in trouble.

2. Rudy Giuliani – Giuliani has phenomenal name recognition and has been doing well in the polls, often polling ahead of McCain. He’s thought of as America’s Mayor for his performance following 9/11. That said, Giuliani is socially moderate and far to the left of most Republican voters on social issues. He did an abysmal job as mayor of New York before 9/11 and his poor performance will be surely talked about by his opponents over time. My guess is that more Republican voters get to know Giuliani, the less they will like him.

3. Mitt Romney – Romney’s biggest opponent is himself, circa twelve years ago. You thought Kerry was a flip-flopper? Well, America, prepare to be introduced the politician from Massachusetts who owns the term. Like Giuliani, the more Republican voters learn about Romney’s past political beliefs, the less he will be viewed as an acceptable candidate.

4. Tommy Thompson – Entering the territory of candidate who are announced, but are really just third tier candidates now we find Tommy Thompson. Thompson’s resume will make him a popular candidate and he’s pushing a very grassroots effort that could fuel a sleeper campaign.

5. Sam Brownback – Brownback is going to be the guy to beat for the support of the religious right. He’s also making good in-roads with business leaders in Iowa, so I don’t think his will be a one-dimensional campaign. Brownback’s my pick to be the dark horse candidate. He is currently suffering from low name recognition, but stands in the right place on most issues Republicans care about (the notable exceptions being his stance on immigration and Iraq, though he’s casting his campaign on principle and faith so he can probably explain these positions away to primary voters).

6. Tom Tancredo – Tancredo may be a single-issue candidate, but immigration is a huge one. Kombiz and others have predicted Tancredo will gain enough support running an anti-immigration platform to become a threat in the field.

7. James Gilmore – Gilmore is similar to Thompson in that he has national connections to major Republican donors, a good resume of both executive leadership and GOP experience, and very old-line Republican issue positioning. Give him time and he could be a real force in this race.

8. Duncan Hunter – Hunter is the other guy running on immigration. He’s not quite as big a fire breather as Tancredo, so I doubt he will be able to push his campaign as far on the anti-immigrant schtick.

9. Ron Paul – Paul ran for president on the Libertarian ticket in 1988. That, near zero name recognition and no issue constituency make him a borderline farcical candidate.

10. John H. Cox – Despite having lost every race he’s ever entered (Congress, Senate, Cook County Recorder of Deeds), Cox has really high hopes for himself this time around. He’s going to self-finance much of his campaign (having already put in a quarter of a million dollars) – but he has to find a base in the early primary states that can buy into his outsider rhetoric or else he’ll be gone soon.

Newt Gingrich, George Pataki, Chuck Hagel, and Mike Huckabee were not included in this ranking because they have neither announced their candidacy nor formed presidential exploratory committees.

13 Responses to “TRF Power Line”

[...] For more on the Republican field, be sure to check out The Right’s Field and their power rankings of Republican candidates. [...]

Gilmore got booted from the RNC Chairmanship after his handpicked successor for the VA Governor’s seat lost to Mark Warner. He’s very much unliked in the RNC’s inner circles and is a third-tier candidate at best. His governance of VA is a big liability.

MFS – I think Gilmore will be able to cast himself as a former governor more than a party spokesman. I don’t think RNC chair is a platform to run on, merely a big leg up from a networking standpoint. Obviously it isn’t universally positive.

“Giuliani did a poor job as Mayor before 9/11″?? Where in the world did that comment come from? Giuliani was a great Mayor. And he was far more conservative than many are aware of. In fact the NY Times in 1999 called him a “government slashing, privatizing Ayn Randian.”

Actually, the reverse is true. When more Conservative GOP primary voters learn of Giuliani’s record as Mayor they will be even more supportive of him. It was only the liberals who hated Giuliani as Mayor.

And that was quite a slight against Ron Paul above. He’s the most Senior member of Congress running for President on the GOP side. He was in Congress in the 1970s when John McCain was a lowly state legislative candidate in Arizona. To call Paul , the most Senior member of the Presidential field, a “farcicle candidate,” is an extreme insult to libertarian Republicans nationwide.

You obviously are biased against libertarians and libertarian views.

Eric Dondero, CEO
http://www.mainstreamlibertarian.com

Paul’s candidacy is dead in the water because he doesn’t have the organization, nor the funding to mount a strong enough campaign.

Hillary Clinton and John McCain are passing on the public funds. All that means is that there will be more money flowing in this presidential race.

So my questions to you is — can Ron Paul raise $100 million this year?

And to take Matt O’s point one step further, anyone who cannot raise $100 million in calendar year 2007 is a farcical candidate. As in not viable. As in all expenditures – likely tens of millions of dollars – will go down the drain.

You are right to raise Paul’s experience, though. I had not realized he had the longest tenure in the field and that does matter. Unfortunately I doubt that the Republican base will nominate a man who’s run on the Libertarian party ticket.

Come on Paul Drop out! That would move John Cox up 2 Ninth!

Join the Movement!
Contribute Now at Cox2008.com

If libertarians are super pro-Giuliani, they must not be familiar with the conduct of the street crimes unit or they’re not a real libertarian. And if fiscal conservatives like Giuliani, they are not familiar with his spending vast sums of money on corporate welfare job retention packages that did nothing for NYC, nor his practices of cronyism.

[...] Recent Comments mfs on TRF Power Line Colton on TRF Power Line Matt Browner Hamlin on TRF Power Line Matt Ortega on McCain Napping During SOTUMatt Ortega on TRF Power Line [...]

[...] I’d love to do a close reading of this article on Rudy Giuliani’s considerations to run, but I’m unfortunately on my way out the door. Giuliani’s formed an exploratory committee and he would be the first candidate to form a PEC and not run in this election cycle. Forming a PEC is tantamount to running these days, which is why we included all candidates who’ve formed a PEC in the TRF Power Line rankings alongside candidates who’ve formally announced. [...]

[...] Recent Comments Emboldened » Blog Archive » NY Times: Giuliani Proceeding Cautiously on TRF Power Line Matt Browner Hamlin on AP: Huckabee to Go Explorin’ on 1/29greenpeas on Hagel’s Principled Opposition Raising His ProfileThe Right’s Field » AP: Huckabee to Go Explorin’ on 1/29 on Brownback, Hunter Promise To Reverse RoeMatt Browner Hamlin on Hagel’s Principled Opposition Raising His Profile [...]

[...] Comments Matt Ortega on NY Times: Giuliani Proceeding CautiouslyThe Right’s Field » NY Times: Giuliani Proceeding Cautiously on TRF Power Line Emboldened » Blog Archive » NY Times: Giuliani Proceeding Cautiouslyon TRF Power Line Matt Browner Hamlin on AP: Huckabee to Go Explorin’ on 1/29greenpeas on Hagel’s Principled Opposition Raising His Profile [...]

Pro-life libertarians who want to give States back there rights as the founding fathers intended and who have served in the US Congress on the Foreign Policy Committee and as US Air Force doctors might appeal to alot more real voters from across the spectrum of American society than you think -

But it is true, the media does control the American mind – a grassroots candidacy without money doesn’t have a chance regardless of substance.

Something to say?