<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brownback Spanks Romney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightsfield.com/2007/03/16/brownback-spanks-romney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/03/16/brownback-spanks-romney/</link>
	<description>Holding Our Noses So You Don&#039;t Have To</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:35:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/03/16/brownback-spanks-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/03/16/brownback-spanks-romney/#comment-893</guid>
		<description>True that his comments did not seem like those that come from a social conservative.  

However,a more global point: brownback can&#039;t win a general election and the issue that matters most to social conservatives is conservative judges on the SC.  If we choose someone like brownback who won&#039;t win, that means hillary or obama will be picking probably at least two justices which will keep the court in limbo.

Mccain i trust the least on this issue.  Guliani it is hard to believer would pick someone who goes agaisnt his proven believes.  romnehy on the other hand has a proven track record on the issues.  He is trying to get elected.  I think he can win the election and I feel most comfortable with him on that issue.

He will pick conservative judges and he will revitalize the conservative movement.  The man is crazy competent and a great communicator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True that his comments did not seem like those that come from a social conservative.  </p>
<p>However,a more global point: brownback can&#8217;t win a general election and the issue that matters most to social conservatives is conservative judges on the SC.  If we choose someone like brownback who won&#8217;t win, that means hillary or obama will be picking probably at least two justices which will keep the court in limbo.</p>
<p>Mccain i trust the least on this issue.  Guliani it is hard to believer would pick someone who goes agaisnt his proven believes.  romnehy on the other hand has a proven track record on the issues.  He is trying to get elected.  I think he can win the election and I feel most comfortable with him on that issue.</p>
<p>He will pick conservative judges and he will revitalize the conservative movement.  The man is crazy competent and a great communicator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Browner Hamlin</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/03/16/brownback-spanks-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Browner Hamlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 14:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/03/16/brownback-spanks-romney/#comment-862</guid>
		<description>Yeah this is a very interesting and surprisingly under-reported line of the campaign. There are people with very solid conservative credentials who stand as alternatives to the Big Three. Yes, they&#039;re much further back in the polls, but if they start making direct attacks on the front-runners, they will likely gain traction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah this is a very interesting and surprisingly under-reported line of the campaign. There are people with very solid conservative credentials who stand as alternatives to the Big Three. Yes, they&#8217;re much further back in the polls, but if they start making direct attacks on the front-runners, they will likely gain traction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
