Here’s a few more points to note in the Ohio Quinnipiac poll. The Democratic top tier is beating the Republican top tier, almost across the board. Notably Hillary Clinton and John Edwards both beat Rudy Giuliani, while Barack Obama ties the Republican front-runner. Mitt Romney is not competitive against all three Democrats.

Illinois Sen. Barack Obama has moved up and now ties Rudolph Giuliani 42 – 42 percent and leads Arizona Sen. John McCain 45 – 37 percent, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University poll finds. In other general election matchups:

* Sen. Clinton defeats Mayor Giuliani 46 – 43 percent; Sen. McCain 46 – 42 percent and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney 51 – 32 percent;
* Sen. Obama bests Romney 51 – 26 percent;
* Edwards has 43 percent to Giuliani’s 42 percent, and tops McCain 45 – 37 percent and Romney 53 – 26 percent.

21 Responses to “More Q-Poll”

talk about cherry picking intelligence. more then 90% of polls show giuliani beating the field across the board, and all indications are his lead is growing. why not show a PA poll, a state won easily by kerry, in which giuliani has a double digit lead over clinton.

you have gone from smears to propaganda already browneye, sad but true.

for everyone else who was curious why old browneye here left out the entire poll results, check here:

http://www.axcessnews.com/modu.....eid=1316 0

rudy up in PA and Florida and in a statistical tie in Ohio

http://www.freerepublic.com/fo.....6804/posts

heres another if that one doesnt work

here is another Quinnipac that has rudy up big on clinton in NJ as well, another state that kerry won easily

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1299.xml?ReleaseID=1024

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1296.xml?ReleaseID=1018

here is another quinnipiac poll showing rudy in a statistical tie with clinton in connecticut. this is why sites like this and the liberal media as a whole aim to discredit rudy with smears and propaganda, because he is a democrats electoral map nightmare.

Learn how to embed a hyperlink. It’s really not hard.

And because I know you’re dying to know why I posted this, it’s because I post on this poll previously vis a vis Fred Thompson blinking and subsequently matching Mitt Romney in the polls.

The same same poll of Ohio showed Dems doing well, so I followed up with it. Deal with it.

deal with what? giuliani cruising to double digit leads in states that have been blue for the last 4 presidential elections? consider it dealt with.

its not hard to copy the link and paste it. if you had the courage to post giuliani’s numbers against clinton and obama in blue states like pa, nj, and ct, then i wouldnt have to.

face it browneye, the republican primaries are moot, giuliani has it locked, the fact that well-known conservative fred thompson could only tie for 4th with a liberal morom shows his weakness, he is zero threat to rudy. perhaps he would like the vp slot, although i think newt is eying it for himself(but both would easily humiliate an obama or a richardson in a vp debate, kind of the way newt embarassed mario quomo just a few weeks ago).

rudy has a big a lead in the south as he does the north, the dems cant persue the western states they had hoped to steal because they will have to waste money in traditional blue states just to hang on. the popular vote may be close, but if the numbers hold true, giuliani is headed for an electoral landslide, and that fact will keep conservatives from being effected by your promoting of attacks on his family.(a new one on his wife will be making the rounds tomorrow) and im sure you will be first to post it here at propagate.com

First, on your formatting problems, one cannot copy and paste something that has an ellipsis in it and expect it to go anywhere (eg, http://www.freerepublic.com/fo…..6804/posts).

You should know by now that your opinion has zero impact on what we post on. If you don’t like what we write about here (like Rudy’s bad relationship with his children or two ex-wives) or what we don’t write about here (Rudy’s unshakable, never changing, 10,000 year domination of electoral politics) you’re going to have to deal with it (as I said before) because we do not cater to you. You are not our audience. You have never displayed sharp political analysis or any awareness of political realities beyond those that feed your obsession with Rudy Giuliani.
(a new one on his wife will be making the rounds tomorrow)

Promise?

“the republican primaries are moot, giuliani has it locked”

OK, then I think you can happily and safely decide to not bother attempting to rebut – in your own, special way – anything written on this site. Obviously Rudy is impervious to our words. So piss off.

ooooo browneye just cant take being proving the desperate hypocrite that he is. oh so testy today brownie, why, is it because i called you on your cherry picking nonsense, proved that q polls are showing giuliani to be the front runner in multiple blue states, or because i announced your smear about his wife before you could. tisk tisk browneye. its just so easy to prove you wrong and a hypocrite. you make michael moore seem fair and balanced. keep up the bad work browner, ill be here to correct you all the way to election day.

You really don’t get it.

And if you actually *read* what I write, you’ll note that I disagreed with the NYPost’s contention that Judith’s disclosure is somehow a “bombshell.”

Matt, is matt referring to you as an ‘asshole’ by using the nickname “browneye”?

Real mature.

Not sure. I just assumed he was misspelling my name because he’s illiterate and writing comments is a great challenge for him.

Something to say?