<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thompson Influencing Hagel&#8217;s Decision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightsfield.com/2007/03/23/thompson-influencing-hagels-decision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/03/23/thompson-influencing-hagels-decision/</link>
	<description>Holding Our Noses So You Don&#039;t Have To</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:14:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hagel On Hold - Waiting For Fred Thompson &#171; Lead Us Forward</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/03/23/thompson-influencing-hagels-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-1275</link>
		<dc:creator>Hagel On Hold - Waiting For Fred Thompson &#171; Lead Us Forward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 04:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/03/23/thompson-influencing-hagels-decision/#comment-1275</guid>
		<description>[...] http://rightsfield.com/2007/03/23/thompson-influencing-hagels-decision/  by Matt Browner Hamlin   3-23-2007 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://rightsfield.com/2007/03/23/thompson-influencing-hagels-decision/ " rel="nofollow">http://rightsfield.com/2007/03..... &nbsp;/ </a> by Matt Browner Hamlin   3-23-2007 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hagel: SVU? at U. of Nebraska - Omaha College Democrats Blog</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/03/23/thompson-influencing-hagels-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-1135</link>
		<dc:creator>Hagel: SVU? at U. of Nebraska - Omaha College Democrats Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/03/23/thompson-influencing-hagels-decision/#comment-1135</guid>
		<description>[...] Interesting speculation from The Right&#8217;s Field: A source that I trust recently had a long conversation with a staffer for Chuck Hagel and passed details of it along to me. Hagel is preparing to set up a campaign headquarters in Nebraska, but is in a holding pattern because former Tennessee Senator Fred Thompson is entertaining thoughts about running for president. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Interesting speculation from The Right&#8217;s Field: A source that I trust recently had a long conversation with a staffer for Chuck Hagel and passed details of it along to me. Hagel is preparing to set up a campaign headquarters in Nebraska, but is in a holding pattern because former Tennessee Senator Fred Thompson is entertaining thoughts about running for president. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/03/23/thompson-influencing-hagels-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-1134</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/03/23/thompson-influencing-hagels-decision/#comment-1134</guid>
		<description>While I agree that Hagel clearly would need to try something like this in order to be competitive, and Thompson might stand in his way, I&#039;d take it in a slightly different direction. 

While Hagel&#039;s conservative voting record would need to be emphasized, and contrasted with the rest of the field&#039;s flip-flopping, he could never get away (nor do I think he&#039;d be inclined to try). Like McCain, his social conservatism is of the staid and non-fire-breathing sort, and not what gets him going. However unlike McCain, he&#039;s never (that I know of) done anything to make anyone question his conservative credentials in that sense (other than for those who need someone driven by that stuff, and who would question his past support for McCain when he clearly was distancing himself). 

Still Thompson definitely is the best positioned to fill that niche if he runs, given his Southern background and lack of visibility as a Bush critic. But otherwise, so long as he doesn&#039;t unnaturally overplay his hand the way McCain has, Hagel could have a good thought here (and clearly, from this, if he ran it would be to win rather than make a point).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that Hagel clearly would need to try something like this in order to be competitive, and Thompson might stand in his way, I&#8217;d take it in a slightly different direction. </p>
<p>While Hagel&#8217;s conservative voting record would need to be emphasized, and contrasted with the rest of the field&#8217;s flip-flopping, he could never get away (nor do I think he&#8217;d be inclined to try). Like McCain, his social conservatism is of the staid and non-fire-breathing sort, and not what gets him going. However unlike McCain, he&#8217;s never (that I know of) done anything to make anyone question his conservative credentials in that sense (other than for those who need someone driven by that stuff, and who would question his past support for McCain when he clearly was distancing himself). </p>
<p>Still Thompson definitely is the best positioned to fill that niche if he runs, given his Southern background and lack of visibility as a Bush critic. But otherwise, so long as he doesn&#8217;t unnaturally overplay his hand the way McCain has, Hagel could have a good thought here (and clearly, from this, if he ran it would be to win rather than make a point).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/03/23/thompson-influencing-hagels-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-1127</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/03/23/thompson-influencing-hagels-decision/#comment-1127</guid>
		<description>Your dead right on this one, Matt.  Good job.  It was curious how no one in the MSM could connect the dots on Hagel&#039;s bizarre non-announcement.  What was a go on a Friday became a holding pattern on a Monday.  The only thing that happened over that weekend was Fred Thompson.  

There is room for only one true conservative to make a run at the top.  And Thompson is better positioned than Hagel (or Gingrich) to make that run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your dead right on this one, Matt.  Good job.  It was curious how no one in the MSM could connect the dots on Hagel&#8217;s bizarre non-announcement.  What was a go on a Friday became a holding pattern on a Monday.  The only thing that happened over that weekend was Fred Thompson.  </p>
<p>There is room for only one true conservative to make a run at the top.  And Thompson is better positioned than Hagel (or Gingrich) to make that run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
