<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recount in Ann Coulter Primary: Why Did She Bail on Mitt?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightsfield.com/2007/06/14/recount-in-ann-coulter-primary-why-did-she-bail-on-mitt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/06/14/recount-in-ann-coulter-primary-why-did-she-bail-on-mitt/</link>
	<description>Holding Our Noses So You Don&#039;t Have To</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:14:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Volunteer Voters</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/06/14/recount-in-ann-coulter-primary-why-did-she-bail-on-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-7824</link>
		<dc:creator>Volunteer Voters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/06/14/recount-in-ann-coulter-primary-why-did-she-bail-on-mitt/#comment-7824</guid>
		<description>[...] Recount in Ann Coulter Primary [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recount in Ann Coulter Primary [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Beeton</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/06/14/recount-in-ann-coulter-primary-why-did-she-bail-on-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-7745</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Beeton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 04:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/06/14/recount-in-ann-coulter-primary-why-did-she-bail-on-mitt/#comment-7745</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;sounds to me that her love for Romney was borne out of a pragmatic desire to win so she chose the most acceptable of the top tier candidates. but as with many of us who struggle between idealism and pragmatism, it looks like she may have shifted back to idealistic purity choosing a &quot;fence not a wall&quot; over a guy who clearly will defend a woman&#039;s right to choose if it becomes the politically expedient thing to do.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds to me that her love for Romney was borne out of a pragmatic desire to win so she chose the most acceptable of the top tier candidates. but as with many of us who struggle between idealism and pragmatism, it looks like she may have shifted back to idealistic purity choosing a &#8220;fence not a wall&#8221; over a guy who clearly will defend a woman&#8217;s right to choose if it becomes the politically expedient thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
