<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Party of Pandering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightsfield.com/2007/06/26/the-party-of-pandering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/06/26/the-party-of-pandering/</link>
	<description>Holding Our Noses So You Don&#039;t Have To</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:14:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Right&#8217;s Field &#187; Phoniness Defended</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/06/26/the-party-of-pandering/comment-page-1/#comment-9059</link>
		<dc:creator>The Right&#8217;s Field &#187; Phoniness Defended</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/06/26/the-party-of-pandering/#comment-9059</guid>
		<description>[...] The Party of Pandering  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Party of Pandering  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Curtis</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/06/26/the-party-of-pandering/comment-page-1/#comment-8976</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/06/26/the-party-of-pandering/#comment-8976</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d hate to see the result of a landslide at a tennis match...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d hate to see the result of a landslide at a tennis match&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Ortega</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/06/26/the-party-of-pandering/comment-page-1/#comment-8973</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Ortega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/06/26/the-party-of-pandering/#comment-8973</guid>
		<description>Game. Set. Match. Paul by a landslide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Game. Set. Match. Paul by a landslide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Curtis</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/06/26/the-party-of-pandering/comment-page-1/#comment-8960</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/06/26/the-party-of-pandering/#comment-8960</guid>
		<description>Murphy,

Mia culpa if I am mistaken as to Romney&#039;s position on the actual issue decided by SCOTUS yesterday. But it&#039;s not much use pretending Romney hasn&#039;t dramatically changed his tune on campaign finance laws in general. &lt;a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/romneys-about-face-on-campaign-funding-2007-02-08.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This is the man&lt;/a&gt; who, in his 1994 Senatorial campaign, &quot;publicly advocated placing spending limits on congressional campaigns and abolishing political action committees&quot; (provisions that would be dropped as too controversial even for McCain&#039;s own reform legislation), who in 2002 wanted to tax political contributions to pay for publicly-financed elections, who was &lt;a href=&quot;http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZWExN2NkNjdkNDYxNDM1MGUxNzE2YzU2ZDI0MWE0MTg=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;described&lt;/a&gt; by Ramesh Ponnuru as holding positions &quot;to the left of McCain-Feingold.&quot;

Which is a record to be proud of. More&#039;s the pity that he&#039;s ditching it to pander to right-wing opponents of campaign finance reform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murphy,</p>
<p>Mia culpa if I am mistaken as to Romney&#8217;s position on the actual issue decided by SCOTUS yesterday. But it&#8217;s not much use pretending Romney hasn&#8217;t dramatically changed his tune on campaign finance laws in general. <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/romneys-about-face-on-campaign-funding-2007-02-08.html" rel="nofollow">This is the man</a> who, in his 1994 Senatorial campaign, &#8220;publicly advocated placing spending limits on congressional campaigns and abolishing political action committees&#8221; (provisions that would be dropped as too controversial even for McCain&#8217;s own reform legislation), who in 2002 wanted to tax political contributions to pay for publicly-financed elections, who was <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZWExN2NkNjdkNDYxNDM1MGUxNzE2YzU2ZDI0MWE0MTg=" rel="nofollow">described</a> by Ramesh Ponnuru as holding positions &#8220;to the left of McCain-Feingold.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which is a record to be proud of. More&#8217;s the pity that he&#8217;s ditching it to pander to right-wing opponents of campaign finance reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: murphy</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/06/26/the-party-of-pandering/comment-page-1/#comment-8953</link>
		<dc:creator>murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/06/26/the-party-of-pandering/#comment-8953</guid>
		<description>Paul,

Your statement that Romney flipped on this issue is completely incorrect.

Romney has consistently called for more TRANSPARENCY in campaign financing, and he has always criticized the approach McCain/Thompson/Rudy supported to squash 1st amendment rights 60 days prior to an election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>Your statement that Romney flipped on this issue is completely incorrect.</p>
<p>Romney has consistently called for more TRANSPARENCY in campaign financing, and he has always criticized the approach McCain/Thompson/Rudy supported to squash 1st amendment rights 60 days prior to an election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
