<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (R)s Falling Behind Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightsfield.com/2007/07/31/rs-falling-behind-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/07/31/rs-falling-behind-online/</link>
	<description>Holding Our Noses So You Don&#039;t Have To</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:14:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Ruffini</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/07/31/rs-falling-behind-online/comment-page-1/#comment-12027</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Ruffini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 02:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/07/31/rs-falling-behind-online/#comment-12027</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a slight mischaracterization in the treatment of my piece. I don&#039;t say that Republicans are being outspent 3-1 on new media. In fact, they are at near parity. I think R&#039;s are a little ahead on a campaign-average basis, and their frontrunners are spending more. 

The key assertion behind this piece is not overall budget levels, but *staffing* levels, which are a lot higher on the Democrat side. This is a case where spending money more efficiently and rationally gets you a better return, not just spending more of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a slight mischaracterization in the treatment of my piece. I don&#8217;t say that Republicans are being outspent 3-1 on new media. In fact, they are at near parity. I think R&#8217;s are a little ahead on a campaign-average basis, and their frontrunners are spending more. </p>
<p>The key assertion behind this piece is not overall budget levels, but *staffing* levels, which are a lot higher on the Democrat side. This is a case where spending money more efficiently and rationally gets you a better return, not just spending more of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
