Comments on: Poll: Republicans Have No Favorite http://rightsfield.com/2007/09/14/poll-republicans-have-no-favorite/ Holding Our Noses So You Don't Have To Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:14:32 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: matt http://rightsfield.com/2007/09/14/poll-republicans-have-no-favorite/comment-page-1/#comment-15156 matt Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:37:14 +0000 http://rightsfield.com/2007/09/14/poll-republicans-have-no-favorite/#comment-15156 whats this damaged moral standing nonsense? i never understood when liberals say things like 'we're losing the moral high ground'. to who? who are we ceding the high ground to? bin laden? iran? korea? who exactly is looking morally superior to us that calls for this ridiculous liberal rhetoric. liberals are just so over the top with rhetoric that facts bounce right off their forehead. liberals see a war with 3700 casualties and call it worse then fdr's 450,000 casualties, truman's 56,000, and johnson's 58,000. i guess dems get a pass when soldiers turn up dead, especially drafted ones. they whine about guatanimo, the safest maximum security prsion on earth, with zero murders. find me one democrat with a prison in their district where they can make that claim. the red cross has an office in git'mo for gods sake. ah and then there is abu ghrab, where soldiers made nudey piles with prisoners, oh the horror. i wonder if nick berg would have prefered a nudey pile or water boarding to having his head sawed off. we are losing no moral highground, zero. this is the liberal tactic though, since no liberal has ever won the presidency on a platform of optimism they instead try to depress the public into voting for failed demosocialist policies. whats even more ridiculous is that this democrat congress has voted to continue funding the war, despite their rhetoric, voted to expand the presidents wiretapping powers, despite their rhetoric, no democrat has offered any of their local prisons to house terrorist prisoners of git'mo, despite their rhetoric, and have offered no alternative of any benefit to our country. bottom line is democrats can't win with high taxes and socialism against low taxes and the free market, so they aim to depress the public to the point of voting for them. carter did it, clinton did it, and clinton part deux will try to do it again. whats this damaged moral standing nonsense? i never understood when liberals say things like ‘we’re losing the moral high ground’. to who? who are we ceding the high ground to? bin laden? iran? korea? who exactly is looking morally superior to us that calls for this ridiculous liberal rhetoric. liberals are just so over the top with rhetoric that facts bounce right off their forehead. liberals see a war with 3700 casualties and call it worse then fdr’s 450,000 casualties, truman’s 56,000, and johnson’s 58,000. i guess dems get a pass when soldiers turn up dead, especially drafted ones. they whine about guatanimo, the safest maximum security prsion on earth, with zero murders. find me one democrat with a prison in their district where they can make that claim. the red cross has an office in git’mo for gods sake. ah and then there is abu ghrab, where soldiers made nudey piles with prisoners, oh the horror. i wonder if nick berg would have prefered a nudey pile or water boarding to having his head sawed off. we are losing no moral highground, zero. this is the liberal tactic though, since no liberal has ever won the presidency on a platform of optimism they instead try to depress the public into voting for failed demosocialist policies.

whats even more ridiculous is that this democrat congress has voted to continue funding the war, despite their rhetoric, voted to expand the presidents wiretapping powers, despite their rhetoric, no democrat has offered any of their local prisons to house terrorist prisoners of git’mo, despite their rhetoric, and have offered no alternative of any benefit to our country.

bottom line is democrats can’t win with high taxes and socialism against low taxes and the free market, so they aim to depress the public to the point of voting for them. carter did it, clinton did it, and clinton part deux will try to do it again.

]]> By: Paul Curtis http://rightsfield.com/2007/09/14/poll-republicans-have-no-favorite/comment-page-1/#comment-15154 Paul Curtis Sat, 15 Sep 2007 03:47:40 +0000 http://rightsfield.com/2007/09/14/poll-republicans-have-no-favorite/#comment-15154 Funny for a Republican to say that, bbatts, considering your party has both made our country weaker and damaged our moral standing. You undermine our national security AND our credibility. Well done. Funny for a Republican to say that, bbatts, considering your party has both made our country weaker and damaged our moral standing.

You undermine our national security AND our credibility. Well done.

]]> By: bbatts http://rightsfield.com/2007/09/14/poll-republicans-have-no-favorite/comment-page-1/#comment-15138 bbatts Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:35:28 +0000 http://rightsfield.com/2007/09/14/poll-republicans-have-no-favorite/#comment-15138 beats being the party of surrender. beats being the party of surrender.

]]>