<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women Having Control Over Their Own Medical Care Is The REAL Holocaust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/</link>
	<description>Holding Our Noses So You Don&#039;t Have To</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:14:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Right&#8217;s Field &#187; ADL to Huckabee: Stop Playing The Holocaust Card</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/comment-page-1/#comment-19299</link>
		<dc:creator>The Right&#8217;s Field &#187; ADL to Huckabee: Stop Playing The Holocaust Card</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/#comment-19299</guid>
		<description>[...] ago, when Mike Huckabee compared a woman&#8217;s choice in determining their own medical care as a holocaust? And some of our more pointy-eared, living-under-a-bridge commenters claimed that Huck was just [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ago, when Mike Huckabee compared a woman&#8217;s choice in determining their own medical care as a holocaust? And some of our more pointy-eared, living-under-a-bridge commenters claimed that Huck was just [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/comment-page-1/#comment-17861</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/#comment-17861</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; while you have the most polarizing woman in the history of the country,&lt;/i&gt;

Madeleine Murray O&#039;Hare is dead Matt, she can&#039;t run.  Or were you talking about Susan B. Anthony?  She certainly did polarize the country, but she&#039;s long dead.  Or maybe you were talking about Jeanette Rankin who as a representative from Montana voted against going into not just 1, but 2 world wars?  She&#039;s dead too, so she can&#039;t be running.  Any of these 3 women (and I can think of several more, like Carry Nation, Mrs Sarah Yorke Jackson, and Phyllis Schlafly) easily beat Mrs. Clinton for the title of most polarizing woman in American history.  Heck, Eleanor Roosevelt is still more polarizing than Hillary.  

Also you&#039;ll find that creaping into your numbers are the number of &quot;abortions&quot; that are removals of miscarriages.  Without the abortion clinic my sister would have had to face a calcified dead fetus which could have ruined her general and reproductive health forever.  The removal of which is an abortion.  

Lastly, you are correct everyone knows who America&#039;s mayor is.  But Bloomberg hasn&#039;t jumped into the race yet, so hold your knickers for a while for that to happen.  You can&#039;t be talking about Rudy because he&#039;s spending faster than he&#039;s bringing in, answers cell phones during speeches, and keeps taking the neocon stance on foreign policy.  He&#039;s imploding almost as fast as McCain and grandpa Fred.  And he&#039;s also in favor of abortions being safe and rare, just like Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> while you have the most polarizing woman in the history of the country,</i></p>
<p>Madeleine Murray O&#8217;Hare is dead Matt, she can&#8217;t run.  Or were you talking about Susan B. Anthony?  She certainly did polarize the country, but she&#8217;s long dead.  Or maybe you were talking about Jeanette Rankin who as a representative from Montana voted against going into not just 1, but 2 world wars?  She&#8217;s dead too, so she can&#8217;t be running.  Any of these 3 women (and I can think of several more, like Carry Nation, Mrs Sarah Yorke Jackson, and Phyllis Schlafly) easily beat Mrs. Clinton for the title of most polarizing woman in American history.  Heck, Eleanor Roosevelt is still more polarizing than Hillary.  </p>
<p>Also you&#8217;ll find that creaping into your numbers are the number of &#8220;abortions&#8221; that are removals of miscarriages.  Without the abortion clinic my sister would have had to face a calcified dead fetus which could have ruined her general and reproductive health forever.  The removal of which is an abortion.  </p>
<p>Lastly, you are correct everyone knows who America&#8217;s mayor is.  But Bloomberg hasn&#8217;t jumped into the race yet, so hold your knickers for a while for that to happen.  You can&#8217;t be talking about Rudy because he&#8217;s spending faster than he&#8217;s bringing in, answers cell phones during speeches, and keeps taking the neocon stance on foreign policy.  He&#8217;s imploding almost as fast as McCain and grandpa Fred.  And he&#8217;s also in favor of abortions being safe and rare, just like Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/comment-page-1/#comment-17859</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/#comment-17859</guid>
		<description>the problem with the 50 million argument (other than its sheer tastelessness) is that it assumes all women having abortions will continue to have as many children later.  In fact, probably a large number of abortions have the practical effect of delaying births.  Meaning that if those 50 million abortions hadn&#039;t happened, many of the women who had them would have declined to later have children that they had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the problem with the 50 million argument (other than its sheer tastelessness) is that it assumes all women having abortions will continue to have as many children later.  In fact, probably a large number of abortions have the practical effect of delaying births.  Meaning that if those 50 million abortions hadn&#8217;t happened, many of the women who had them would have declined to later have children that they had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/comment-page-1/#comment-17858</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/#comment-17858</guid>
		<description>Government should just stay out of personal matters like this. No further discussion needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Government should just stay out of personal matters like this. No further discussion needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Harmon</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/comment-page-1/#comment-17857</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/#comment-17857</guid>
		<description>Hey Matt - Why do you hide? Who are you? How about a website or blog or last name? 

Otherwise your just cheap graffiti.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Matt &#8211; Why do you hide? Who are you? How about a website or blog or last name? </p>
<p>Otherwise your just cheap graffiti.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/comment-page-1/#comment-17853</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/#comment-17853</guid>
		<description>&#039;Is that really all you have at this point?&#039;

no, i have a candidate that out paces your democrats in PA, Ohio, NJ, Michigan, and Florida, while you have the most polarizing woman in the history of the country, hahaha.  if roe v wade was overturned, as it should be, then abortion would return to the states and would be on the ballots in each state. in my state i would vote choice because thats what i believe, what i would never dream of forcing another state to follow it. they should have the right to decide for themselves. termination of pregnancies dates back to ancient times, and if they felt it was a right, the framers would have included it in the constitution, but they did not.  only an amendment to the constitution would grant it as a right, instead of the judicial activism that has made the law what it is today.






&#039;No one outside the fundie circles knows or cares who the hell he is&#039;

uh what? everyone knows who america&#039;s mayor is, and clear headed logical people understand he is going to be the next president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Is that really all you have at this point?&#8217;</p>
<p>no, i have a candidate that out paces your democrats in PA, Ohio, NJ, Michigan, and Florida, while you have the most polarizing woman in the history of the country, hahaha.  if roe v wade was overturned, as it should be, then abortion would return to the states and would be on the ballots in each state. in my state i would vote choice because thats what i believe, what i would never dream of forcing another state to follow it. they should have the right to decide for themselves. termination of pregnancies dates back to ancient times, and if they felt it was a right, the framers would have included it in the constitution, but they did not.  only an amendment to the constitution would grant it as a right, instead of the judicial activism that has made the law what it is today.</p>
<p>&#8216;No one outside the fundie circles knows or cares who the hell he is&#8217;</p>
<p>uh what? everyone knows who america&#8217;s mayor is, and clear headed logical people understand he is going to be the next president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHubbard</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/comment-page-1/#comment-17845</link>
		<dc:creator>MHubbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/#comment-17845</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;hey dave, my boy is soon going to be your president, the religous cooks might not like him now, but as soon as your foolish party sends up hillary, its game over&lt;/B&gt;

I&#039;ll take that bet. Easiest money a person can make. 

No one outside the fundie circles knows or cares who the hell he is, Matt. How exactly, and with what numbers, do you surmise he&#039;ll be president?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>hey dave, my boy is soon going to be your president, the religous cooks might not like him now, but as soon as your foolish party sends up hillary, its game over</b></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll take that bet. Easiest money a person can make. </p>
<p>No one outside the fundie circles knows or cares who the hell he is, Matt. How exactly, and with what numbers, do you surmise he&#8217;ll be president?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/comment-page-1/#comment-17844</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/#comment-17844</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s Roe v Wade.

Spell it correctly.  I don&#039;t know how you can claim something is unconstitutional if you aren&#039;t even aware of its proper spelling.  And you&#039;re obviously not pro-choice so I&#039;m unsure why you even prefaced your comment with that.  Your comment is steeped in ignorant and disingenuous claims. 

Do you honestly feel that intern jokes are humorous?  Is that really all you have at this point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Roe v Wade.</p>
<p>Spell it correctly.  I don&#8217;t know how you can claim something is unconstitutional if you aren&#8217;t even aware of its proper spelling.  And you&#8217;re obviously not pro-choice so I&#8217;m unsure why you even prefaced your comment with that.  Your comment is steeped in ignorant and disingenuous claims. </p>
<p>Do you honestly feel that intern jokes are humorous?  Is that really all you have at this point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/comment-page-1/#comment-17810</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 05:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/#comment-17810</guid>
		<description>hey dave, my boy is soon going to be your president, the religous cooks might not like him now, but as soon as your foolish party sends up hillary, its game over bwahaahahahahaahaha nice favorables hillary bwahahahahahahaha her first act as president: fire all the female interns hahahahahahhaa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey dave, my boy is soon going to be your president, the religous cooks might not like him now, but as soon as your foolish party sends up hillary, its game over bwahaahahahahaahaha nice favorables hillary bwahahahahahahaha her first act as president: fire all the female interns hahahahahahhaa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sleep Thief</title>
		<link>http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/comment-page-1/#comment-17803</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sleep Thief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightsfield.com/2007/10/20/women-having-control-over-their-own-medical-care-is-the-real-holocaust/#comment-17803</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t see how you can talk about a holocaust without conjuring in your own mind or those of your listeners the memory of The Holocaust. By using that word, rather than talking about just a mass murder, you are invoking, deliberately and for effect, the emotional reaction we all have to Hitler&#039;s genocide. And that&#039;s crass, plain and simple. You wouldn&#039;t stand up and say, &quot;The REAL 9-11 is Roe v Wade&quot; or &quot;The REAL Virginia Tech is Roe v Wade&quot;. Why not grant the victims of the Holocaust the same respect? A second point: it may be that only the minority of abortions are matters of medical necessity, but the pro-life forces, as the SD referendum showed, cannot consistently make allowance even for that minority of cases. If abortion is murder then there is no room to allow it under any circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t see how you can talk about a holocaust without conjuring in your own mind or those of your listeners the memory of The Holocaust. By using that word, rather than talking about just a mass murder, you are invoking, deliberately and for effect, the emotional reaction we all have to Hitler&#8217;s genocide. And that&#8217;s crass, plain and simple. You wouldn&#8217;t stand up and say, &#8220;The REAL 9-11 is Roe v Wade&#8221; or &#8220;The REAL Virginia Tech is Roe v Wade&#8221;. Why not grant the victims of the Holocaust the same respect? A second point: it may be that only the minority of abortions are matters of medical necessity, but the pro-life forces, as the SD referendum showed, cannot consistently make allowance even for that minority of cases. If abortion is murder then there is no room to allow it under any circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
