In recent years, when Pat Robertson has made statements like “We should assassinate Hugo Chavez” or Gays and lesbians are to blame for 9/11″ or “Cities that reject intelligent design deserve to receive a hurricane”, evangelicals would always claim that his influence has been lessened over the years and he is no longer relevant.
On the August 23, 2005 episode of Fox News’ Special Report, Hume declared, “The televangelist Pat Robertson’s political influence may have been declining since he came in second in the Iowa Republican caucuses 17 years ago. And he may have no clout with the Bush administration.”
Morton Kondracke echoed Hume, exclaiming that “Pat Robertson’s day has long since passed.”
Therefore, I guess the least relevant evangelical leader in America just endorsed Rudy Giuliani. (Hey, how’s that “We deserved 9/11″ business square with that?)
I’m not sure what his import is anymore. His influence in creating the law school, Regent University, attended by the likes of Monica Goodling and dozens of other Bush Administration Justice Department officials, is considerable. My point is that this will suddenly be seen as “the most important endorsement EVAH” after years of hearing that Robertson is a crazy old coot and an afterthought. Just a window into how the media works.
Robertson is a partisan political operative, not a religious leader, and this endorsement kind of proves it, as it goes against all appearances of principle on what he’s considered to be core issues like abortion and gay rights. Other social conservatives are looking in other directions, like Sam Brownback, who chose his Senate colleague John McCain.
“John McCain is the only candidate who can rally the Reagan coalition of conservatives, independents and conservative Democrats needed to defeat Hillary Clinton or any other Democrat in the general election next year,” Brownback said in a statement.
He praised McCain for spending a lifetime “standing up for human rights around the world, including a consistent 24-year pro-life record of protecting the rights of the unborn.”
I guess none of that matters to Robertson, who would rather choose the candidate most likely to eat a terrorist and spit out the bones. Ultimately I think these endorsements mean little compared to boots on the ground and organization in the early states. What they are is a window into the real concerns of the so-called “religious right.”
6 Responses to “Endorsements”
first, roberston’s call to take out chavez is clearly based on the policies of prominent democrats, namely john and robert knennedy, who tried multiple times to murder fidel castro. seeing how chavez is referred to by almost everyone as the “new castro” it is clear where robertson got the idea.
as for boots on the ground, many of the right wing activists got their start on robertson’s campaign 17 years ago, and may be drawn to their original candidates choice for president.
bottom line, its hurts flip floppin mitt, and it completely drowned out brownback and mccain. another win for team rudy.
it was actually falwell who said we deserved 9/11, if you are going to smear at least get some of your facts right, yeeeesh
God Gave U.S. ‘What We Deserve,’ Falwell Says
By John F. Harris
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, September 14, 2001; Page C03
Television evangelists Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, two of the most prominent voices of the religious right, said liberal civil liberties groups, feminists, homosexuals and abortion rights supporters bear partial responsibility for Tuesday’s terrorist attacks because their actions have turned God’s anger against America.
“God continues to lift the curtain and allow the enemies of America to give us probably what we deserve,” said Falwell, appearing yesterday on the Christian Broadcasting Network’s “700 Club,” hosted by Robertson.
“Jerry, that’s my feeling,” Robertson responded. “I think we’ve just seen the antechamber to terror. We haven’t even begun to see what they can do to the major population.”
————-
General semantic point: if you get your facts right it’s technically not a smear, it’s a statement of said facts.
[...] candidacy was only the second-most important Christian fundamentalist endorsement this week. As David explained, Robertson may be a celebrity but his actual influence on the right has faded considerably. Paul [...]
Something to say?
[...] Atlantic Online, TalkLeft, New York Magazine, Stop The ACLU, Gawker, Taylor Marsh, Washington Wire, The Right’s Field, Wake up America, Attytood, FP Passport, MSNBC, The Van Der Galiën Gazette, All Spin Zone, Sister [...]
Left by Chuck Adkins » Shocker! Pat Robertson Endorses Giuliani
November 7, 2007 at 1:03pm