Archive for February, 2008

These guys never seem to get it do they?

Redstate.com Editor Erick Erickson tells his audience that they must read a piece in today’s Wall Street Journal which makes the case that the Republicans lost the election in 2006 because of out- of-control spending, and argues that they will lose the 2008 election as well if they don’t work towards “re-establishing the GOP as a party of limited government and economic freedom,” and pick a fiscally conservative running-mate for McCain.

It’s no secret that John McCain believes that his party lost the 2006 mid-terms because of spending (so does former candidate and still fascist Rudy Giuliani), and with a clueless doofus like him at the top of the ticket, Democrats should take advantage of the opportunity to continue to highlight how out of touch with the country the Republican party is.

After all, the Republicans lost the 2006 elections because of Bush’s unpopularity, the war in Iraq, and corruption. And Bush will still be president come this November (and he seems eager to campaign for McCain, which of course could likely doom the Senator’s candidacy), the war will still be going terribly, and a new crop of scandals is threatening to further sully the Republican party’s reputation.

You guys just keep running on the idea that the country hates you because of over-spending. I dare you.

(Cross posted at The November Blog)

Shorter Mitt Romney

Posted by Matt Browner Hamlin on February 7th, 2008

I challenge anyone to come up with a better “Shorter” version of Mitt Romney’s exit speech than TBogg:

Our country, our world, our culture, our existence face enormous threats. I quit.

Genius.

Yeah, pretty much.

Sometimes, as we boys need reminding, it takes a woman to inject some common sense into complicated decision-making like “Should I run for higher office?”

(Sometimes, not.)

Maybe the evidence is all circumstantial, but it’s there. First there’s the oft-cited story about Ann Romney not wanting all of Mitt’s money, so hard earned laying off every worker he could find, to go into the hands of the genius political consultants who came up with bright ideas like “Mitt should run against Massachusetts,” and “I’m withdrawing from this race because staying in it will aid and abet terrorists by electing a Democrat.”

The idea that Mrs. Romney was worried more about Mitt’s money than about his desire to win was brought up at the Daily Telegraph:

His wife Ann made him agree to keep to a personal limit of $40 million, which he exceeded by up to $10 million in the past week of the campaign.

“What was he going to do? Just carry on spending his sons’ inheritance,” said a member of the McCain campaign at the conference.

But I think there’s more to it than that. Our man Mitt seemed to be a little bit defensive about the prospect of fighting with his old lady before Super Tuesday. Check out this statement and immediate back-up from it when Romney discussed stretching out and sleeping on the floor of his airplane:

There are no flat-bed seats in Romney’s charter plane. He does enjoy a wide business class seat in the front row but he said he planned to spend the red-eye flight on the floor.

“It’s been a while since I slept on the floor,” he told reporters on the flight to California. “Usually if I’m in trouble I sleep on the sofa,” he said.

A father of five who frequently talks about family values, Romney quickly took back the suggestion that he gets in trouble with his wife, Ann.

“Actually I’ve not been in trouble to sleep on the sofa. But sometimes in the middle of the night if I wake up and can’t sleep, instead of bothering Ann by tossing and turning, I sleep on the sofa,” he said.

“Camping is probably the last time I slept on the ground,” he said, adding that was perhaps a decade ago. “It’s been a long time.”

You’ve got to hand it to him. Mitt sure was an acrobat everyday on the campaign trail.

But I think there was more evidence of some tension between the two. How about when Romney started out his concession speech on Tuesday night by saying that his wife was WRONG:

Ann came to me and she said, ‘You know, the one thing that’s clear tonight is that nothing’s clear.’ But I think she’s wrong. One thing that’s clear is this campaign’s going on. I think there are some people who thought it was all going to be done tonight. But it’s not all done tonight. We’re going to keep on battling. We’re going to go all the way to the convention. We’re going to win this thing, and we’re going to get to the White House.

I’m sure she loved that. “My wife doesn’t believe in me!” is what starting off a major speech like that screams out. Dr. Phil would not be pleased.

But ultimately, Mitt really is all about his family. Word is Mitt and Ann talked this over last night. And when he says, “I’m doing this because I love America,” he really may mean “I’m doing this because I love my wife” as much as he means, “I’m doing this because I love my money.”

And let’s face it – Mitt was never a very good candidate for the Republican nomination. Even if Anne Coulter was lining up Big Love-style to be his second wife, he had too much non-conservative baggage to be bought into by the real GOP crowd, and just about everyone on both sides saw him as a phoney.

What this campaign was really about for Romney was ego. That ego was evident when he declared on Tuesday, “That’s pretty fun. First time I’ve ever voted for myself for president.”

Ultimately, it seems like it took the Mrs. to put that ego away. She probably said to Mitt, “This election is making you into a dick, and I don’t like it when you’re being a dick.  I need you to drop out.”

And to that, we all can say, “Thank you, Ann, thank you.

I’m Freezing Without My Mittens!!

Posted by Noah Noah on February 7th, 2008

Brrrrrrrr. Why is it so cold in here?

Oh, it’s because Mittens has dropped out!

Man, as Wonkette says, “It’s a sad day for humor.”

Ol’ Freddie? Dead.

9iu11ani? Conceded to the terrorists.

And Mittens? Bought the farm. Or at least tried to.

Somehow, the idea of making fun of John McCain for the next 9 months just doesn’t strike my fancy.

Yikes, are we going to have to start talking about the issues now?

(Cross posted at The November Blog)

[Update]: Mittens will be back! In 2012! To run against President McClintobama! Mittens 2012! Mittens 2012! Tagg’s inheritance will be spent!!!!

Pop Quiz Time

Posted by David Dayen on February 6th, 2008

So Mitt Romney, who was embarrassed in California, a beaten third all over the Southwest and really only strong in states he had a house in, has decided to spend Tagg’s future kids’ college funds and stay in a futile quest for the GOP nomination. And the bureau chief at Pravda Online Hugh Hewitt decided to make an analogy to commemorate this bold (some would say ignorant) decision. Now what public figure from the recent past do you suppose Hewitt would use in said analogy to describe Romney’s choice?

I’ll give you ten seconds. Hum the “Match Game PM” theme to keep time.

….

Give up?

Like Reagan In ‘76, Romney Is Staying In

Congratulations! Hugh Hewitt, you’re the proud recipient of the Reagan Library’s “One Billion References to Reagan” Award! We’ll fly you and a guest first-class from Reagan National Airport to Simi Valley for a tour of the Reagan Library! That’s right, you’ll drive down the Ronald Reagan Freeway and onto Ronald Reagan Drive, where you’ll take in the Reagan Oval Office, the Reagan legacy, and the Reagan Reagan, a special of this prize package!! And we’ll give you a stack of Reagan dimes and a DVD copy of the CBS miniseries “The Reagans” for you to burn!! Reagan Reagan Reagan 9/11 Reagan!!!

Sheesh, if they could re-animate St. Ronnie’s corpse… he’d do better than Mitt Romney. And actually that’d make at least 3 corpses running on the GOP side this year.

Well, it was clear that Man-On-Dog sex obsessed former Senator Rick Santorum wasn’t a fan of John McCain, but I was thinking that a Huckabee endorsement (woof!) was more likely…

Surprisingly, Santorum (and please, check out the first link you get when you Google “Santorum“) today endorsed Mitt Romney for president.

Wow.

First it was strap the dog to the roof of the car.

Then it was who let the dogs out?

Now it’s man-on-dog love.

New campaign slogan: Mitt Romney Does America: Doggystyle.

(Cross posted at The November Blog)